Mar 17

Art direction: Actually, I wasn’t really looking for an actual castle. Instead, could you have a couple of people juggling things with little water tentacle creatures and others watching them? And if we had a close up of one of the guys making you think “is he juggling those balls with magic… or just… well, juggling?” … anyway, if we had that, that’d be juuuust great.
Thanks to CSA!





Lastest Tweet
March 23rd, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Good book. Bad cover!
March 26th, 2010 at 12:59 am
Its not even a Mark Harrison cover you imbecile.Good lord get the artist right first you halfwit.
March 26th, 2010 at 11:37 am
Glad your getting into the spirit of the site! Submit your bad/cheesy covers using the submit page.
March 26th, 2010 at 12:22 pm
Hi Michael,
Thanks for pointing that out. It’s not always easy to verify who the cover artist is and it’s good to know when a mistake has been made.
A great many of these covers are utterly amazing and it’s best that credit can be given where its due.
J
April 30th, 2010 at 1:43 pm
I just want to point out that he is, indeed, simply juggling. It’s an important plot point in the book. Or at least a lot of pages are devoted to it. I don’t know that this cover actually sells books, but it does provide a valuable consumer notice: “Juggling inside.”
April 30th, 2010 at 5:22 pm
Gah, you’ve spoilt if for me now Hitch! I liked to think he was simply using the power of his mind.
If I’m ever on the look out for a book on the basis of juggling, this will be a sure fire bet!
May 15th, 2010 at 5:40 pm
I own this painting. Another masterpiece by Jim Burns.
May 28th, 2010 at 5:56 pm
A cover pulled right out of, I think, the early 90′s
The book was middling in my opinion (good in bits, though) but the cover is truly terrible. If you’re curious there IS a castle… on the back. And veeery very tiny.
May 30th, 2010 at 5:45 am
1981 actually. You may not have liked the story, but the painting is accurate. And the castle is massive, with thousands of rooms. Try re-reading the book retard.