preload
Jan 28

Collection of the Gods

Add comments

Even gods lack adequate chest support!Click for full image

Ok! What would gods normally do, while inhabiting the body of a busty half naked women? Hmmm, how about standing by a sweet tower glowing oddly, on all fours in front of some sort of cat creature and swinging a sword about to decapitate a snake. Gods are all about the sexual innuendo! Yeaaaaahhhhaaa!

Thanks to David D!

Actually, that is a pretty good cover!That could be much worse.Now that is slightly embarrassingNasty, but I would still take it on a train.It is somewhere in between the awful/good scale.Would not like to be seen reading that!Awful... just Awful...I swear, that\'s my flatmates!Gah... my eyes! They are burning!Good Show Sir.... Good Show! (Rating: 7.38 out of 10)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tagged with: • • • • • • • • •

11 Responses to “Collection of the Gods”

  1. SI Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 10:01 am

    Haha good spelling mistake also in the picture! :D

  2. Simon Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 10:05 am

    Pathway to the Gouds!

    These are spectacularly awful.

  3. Simon Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 10:05 am

    ‘ . . . of the Gouds’

    I’ve gone blind . . .

  4. SI Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 10:30 am

    No they are not Simon. As the note says, they are the perfect gift. And to be signed by the authour, who wouldn’t jump at the chance?

    That was just to point it out, to anyone that hadn’t noticed. Unless there is a strange american spelling of author… then I’d look rather silly.

  5. little mi Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 11:11 am

    hmm… do you really trust the gift choices of a bookseller who can’t spell author?! Not a great sign really.

    I had a blind moment and read the last title as Bothering Gods, which actually sounds much more interesting.

  6. James Lovegrove Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 11:39 am

    I read it as “Fathering Gods”, which, given the nubility of the ladies on the covers, well, wouldn’t you?

  7. CSA Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 11:49 am

    Well i’m not sure Little Mi has the right equipment for the task.

    Sad to see an authours credability taking a hit because of a rather slow bookshop manager. There were ample opportunities to spot the mispelling; when writing it, when photocopying it and when putting it under the book which has a sticker with correct spelling on it…

  8. CSA Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 11:51 am

    * misspelt “misspelling” gawd damn *

  9. Nix Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    Also ‘credibility’ and ‘awthour’.

  10. CSA Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    Ah i dnit sopt ‘credibility’, but I thnik if i wroked in a bokooshp id mkae mroe eoffrt to sepll tihngs crorcelty.

    you say tomato, i say tmotao

  11. Karl Says:
    January 28th, 2010 at 9:31 pm

    All that’s missing is that Baen guy’s head on the cover. Or are these books for fanboys who think “Tomb Raider” too deep and literary?

Leave a Reply