Comments on: Collection of the Gods

By: Karl

Karl — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:31:26 +0000

All that’s missing is that Baen guy’s head on the cover. Or are these books for fanboys who think “Tomb Raider” too deep and literary?

By: CSA

CSA — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:55:45 +0000

Ah i dnit sopt ‘credibility’, but I thnik if i wroked in a bokooshp id mkae mroe eoffrt to sepll tihngs crorcelty.

you say tomato, i say tmotao

By: Nix

Nix — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:10:53 +0000

Also ‘credibility’ and ‘awthour’.

By: CSA

CSA — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:51:42 +0000

* misspelt “misspelling” gawd damn *

By: CSA

CSA — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:49:24 +0000

Well i’m not sure Little Mi has the right equipment for the task.

Sad to see an authours credability taking a hit because of a rather slow bookshop manager. There were ample opportunities to spot the mispelling; when writing it, when photocopying it and when putting it under the book which has a sticker with correct spelling on it…

By: James Lovegrove

James Lovegrove — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:39:01 +0000

I read it as “Fathering Gods”, which, given the nubility of the ladies on the covers, well, wouldn’t you?

By: little mi

little mi — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:11:41 +0000

hmm… do you really trust the gift choices of a bookseller who can’t spell author?! Not a great sign really.

I had a blind moment and read the last title as Bothering Gods, which actually sounds much more interesting.

By: SI

SI — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:30:50 +0000

No they are not Simon. As the note says, they are the perfect gift. And to be signed by the authour, who wouldn’t jump at the chance?

That was just to point it out, to anyone that hadn’t noticed. Unless there is a strange american spelling of author… then I’d look rather silly.

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:05:56 +0000

‘ . . . of the Gouds’

I’ve gone blind . . .

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:05:01 +0000

Pathway to the Gouds!

These are spectacularly awful.