preload
Oct 18

Mythical Creature Blind DateClick for full image

Johnny Comments: What can you even say?
Published 1948

Actually, that cover is a visual feast!I would pick that one up.Neeaaa, I've seen worse.Interesting, but I would still take it on a train.It's somewhere between the awful/good scale.Would not like to be seen reading that!Awful... just awful...I swear, thats my flatmates!Gah... my eyes! They are burning!Good Show Sir.... Good Show! (Average: 8.60 out of 10)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tagged with:

19 Responses to “Who Goes There?”

  1. Adam Roberts Says:

    The nail varnish! Good GOD the nail varnish!

  2. james Says:

    yeah, it’s weird, but it is kinda cool :-)

  3. Jerk of all Trades Says:

    I think her enormous, misshapen cheeks are freaking me out more than those nails.

  4. L.B. Says:

    More importantly, are they friend or foe?

  5. Zevallo Says:

    Now now, be kind to that three eyed beauty! That’s an admittedly bizarre representation if the monster from the eponymous story – which was the inspiration for a particular John Carpenter film. So that’s not just any old strange thing – that’s The THING. :D

    Yeah, no, but this is a pretty damn trippy cover.

  6. Michael Toland Says:

    What makes that cover even weirder is that this is the novella upon which the various movies called The Thing are based. Did the cover designer bother to at least read the synopsis?

  7. A.R.Yngve Says:

    Perhaps Hannes Bok (the artist) struggled to depict the gruesomeness of The Thing, but had to give up and use a cover for an entirely different story…

  8. THX 1138 Says:

    An expression that says: “I can’t believe his jazz hands. And he’s half squirrel.”

  9. Phil Says:

    This is one that’s well executed, but weird; true of so much of Bok’s work. I’m particularly fond of the back-cover hairy legs, and the extraordinary robot with size 15 feet on the spine.

  10. Phil Says:

    By the way, I think we should have a tag for wraparound cover art (or whatever the technical term is in the trade).

  11. Tom Noir Says:

    “Make sure you use red to highlight his nipples.”

  12. Sophaloaf Says:

    She just can’t keep her eyes off of him.

  13. drlemaster Says:

    You know, if John Carpenter had cast David Bowie in the 80s The Thing movie, I can totally see the thing on the left making an appearance.

  14. fred Says:

    The robot needs big feet to counteract its top heavy design.
    1948 – 33 1/3 records, the first monkey astronaut and the birth of Ozzy Osbourne

  15. Phil Says:

    Actually, it’s not just the robot who has disproportionate feet. Old hairy legs does, too. And if I’m honest, the red-haired beauty is a bit out of proportion, too. Just a tiny, tiny bit.

    Hannes Bok: great artist, not so great when it comes to feet.

  16. Andrew Says:

    I’m still trying to figure out how the three-eyed creature’s right arm works. It looks like it should be folded up, thus covering the breasts, judging by what appears to be an elbow in the middle of the body mass, but the right hand is clearly next to the right knee. Does “she” have two elbows on her right arm or am I misinterpreting something?

  17. Sneaky Burrito Says:

    @Andrew: I think it might be a really big shoulder that you’re seeing. Maybe.

  18. Jaouad Says:

    Three eyes, and still unable to see who goes there?

  19. Alessandra Kelley Says:

    But that’s Hannes Bok, one of my favorite pulp illustrators. He’s awesome! And renowned for his weird, creepy illustrations.

    And the story is the one the movie “The Thing” is based on, as others have noted.

    Bok is an inspired choice to illustrate a shapeshifting doppelgänger alien that doesn’t quite get it right.

    I love this cover.

Leave a Reply