Mar 02
Click for full imageBibliomancer Comments: Half Girl Friend, Half Night Mare
Published 1987
(Average: 6.03 out of 10)
Loading...
Bibliomancer Comments: Half Girl Friend, Half Night Mare
Published 1987
(Average: 6.03 out of 10)Loading...
(9.25 out of 10) (9.18 out of 10) (9.01 out of 10) (8.97 out of 10) (8.93 out of 10) (8.93 out of 10) (8.93 out of 10) (8.92 out of 10) (8.88 out of 10) (8.88 out of 10)
Lastest Tweet
March 2nd, 2017 at 11:54 am
Hold your horses, I’m really not a ‘huggy’ person.
March 2nd, 2017 at 1:02 pm
George R.R. Martin in an early OOC moment.
March 2nd, 2017 at 1:38 pm
That is terrible riding posture.
March 2nd, 2017 at 1:42 pm
Yippie ai-oh…
Yippie ai-eh…
Gross riders in the sky!
March 2nd, 2017 at 2:06 pm
So I guess you’d call that a “Centauresse”? “Centaurette”? At any rate, maybe the artist should have gone to this model for inspiration.
March 2nd, 2017 at 2:09 pm
@B. Chiclitz – That is the “before” centaur girlfriend picture. This is the “after.”
March 2nd, 2017 at 3:05 pm
So, Night Mare had the front half of a horse. Night Visions has the back half of a horse. If I go to pour myself a Night Cap, what part of the horse will I get?
March 2nd, 2017 at 3:40 pm
Change NIGHT to ZOMBIE and George could have created a billion dollar multi-media empire.
March 2nd, 2017 at 3:48 pm
This is the worst panto I’ve ever attended.
March 2nd, 2017 at 3:53 pm
@THX: I dunno, the dry-ice effects didn’t malfunction and whoever’s the back end of the Pantomime Horse is probably enjoying it.
And there’s no sign of the Chuckle Brothers.
March 2nd, 2017 at 4:13 pm
@DSWBT—
If I go to pour myself a Night Cap, what part of the horse will I get?
Why, the kick, of course 😉
March 2nd, 2017 at 4:39 pm
She’s demonstrating the little-known centaur ability of rubber shoulders.
March 2nd, 2017 at 9:09 pm
I never really thought about it before but evidently the human half gets the umbilical cord.
March 2nd, 2017 at 9:25 pm
@BC: 😉
March 2nd, 2017 at 9:40 pm
I wonder if any teachers dressed as this for World Book Day.
March 2nd, 2017 at 11:42 pm
Besides the overall fugly, I am really not able to figure out the anatomy of the part between the navel and the front legs. “anatomical issues” indeed.
(But no listing for Clive Barker, TagW?)
@DSWBT (7): His or her hat, of course.
You might get a full horse if you tried MARE VISIONS, but whether the two parts would be connected, I dunno.
March 3rd, 2017 at 1:14 am
Meanwhile, in another episode of “What It Says on the Tin”:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0148T4E9Q/ref=series_rw_dp_sw
First in a series of SIX. All about 100 pages long, but asking $2.99 for that. With inappropriate tattoos.
March 6th, 2017 at 12:15 pm
I think that, if you want to make a centaur look anatomically plausible, you could substitute the scapulae of the horse for the pelves of the human and run the abdominals into the clavicles and pectorals of the horse. Notice that this one doesn’t.
March 6th, 2017 at 1:58 pm
B. Chiclitz said:
So I guess you’d call that a “Centauresse”? “Centaurette”?
– The woke, identity-respecting label should be “QuadropedFemCaucasian” (or QPFC) — sexual orientation not specified.
March 6th, 2017 at 2:00 pm
@A.R.Yngve – If we don’t know their gender, how do we know which stall they can use?
March 6th, 2017 at 2:10 pm
@DeadSWBT(18)—does this one do that?
March 6th, 2017 at 3:45 pm
@BC: That’s completely absurd! Look, she’s just waltzing around with a strung bow that appears to have no method to hold the string in place, AND it looks like the string’s resting up against her wrist! BALONEY, sir, complete baloney.
As for the rest of the centaurides, she’s done well enough. The relationship between the woman’s legs and the horse’s forelegs is well done. There’s a funny divot where the woman’s Mons Pubis should be, they could’ve used more horse hide there and left it up to the imagination.