preload
May 05

My friend, you are obviously suffering from an anal probe fixation.Click for full image

JuanPaul Comments: Who knew that the upturned palm, universal symbol of intelligent discourse, also applied to molluscs. You, sir artist, are a master.

Published 1985

Actually, that cover IS a classical work of art!I would touch it without protective gloves.I've seen worse. Far, far, worse.Interesting, but I would still read it in public.Middlng: Neither awful nor awfully goodWould not like to be seen reading that!Awful... just awful...That belongs in a gold-lame picture frame!Gah... my eyes are burning! Feels so good!Good Show Sir! (Average: 6.78 out of 10)
Loading...

Tagged with:

24 Responses to “The Remaking of Sigmund Freud”

  1. Dead Stuff With Big Teeth Says:

    Once again Freud brings new meaning to the word ‘fishmonger’.

  2. Bibliomancer Says:

    “You must read my important paper: The Ego and the Squid

  3. Perry Armstrong Says:

    Typical bloody remake – way too much CGI.

  4. fred Says:

    Sometimes a cover with Sigmund Freud and a squid alien is just a cover with Sigmund Freud and a squid alien.

  5. THX 1138 Says:

    “Gimme 5! Ay! Up high! Down low – too slow!”

  6. Ray P Says:

    “When did you first feel this attraction to Japanese schoolgirls?”

  7. misterbob Says:

    “When did you first feel this attraction to AMSTRAD computers ? “

  8. Dead Stuff With Big Teeth Says:

    ‘Release the kraken!’ has now become ‘Release your feelings, kraken!’

  9. B. Chiclitz Says:

    Ach! This one is even weirder than that Wolf Man guy I saw last week. All right Mr. Squid, and what did you feel when you saw your parents together on the sea bed?”

  10. Tat Wood Says:

    “Raark! Polly shouldn’t be!’

  11. Anna T. Says:

    Freud: All your troubles stem from the fact that, deep down inside, you’re obsessed with sex.
    Squid Alien: . . . Can I get a second opinion?

  12. Ray P Says:

    “My parent was a hermaphrodite, doc. How does the Oedipus complex apply?”

  13. SI Says:

    Well this isn’t my usual sex with mother dream, ah well time for me to get naked.

  14. HappyBookworm Says:

    @Bibliomancer – Nice one.

    Honestly, If Freud’s work had been about rational conversations with sentient, mutant squid instead of about overconfident, subjective dream analysis I think it would have made for an improvement for subsequent literary critics everywhere. My opinion, anyhow.

  15. Francis Boyle Says:

    I was blissfully unaware that the word ‘alienist’ had an old meaning.

  16. A.R.Yngve Says:

    “Doctor, why do I keep having these nightmares about being dropped into a cabinet filled with crushed ice and a sign that says ‘Today’s Catch’?”

  17. THX 1139 Says:

    Freud remade as… Oliver Sacks?

  18. Bruce A Munro Says:

    “Okay, tentacles. Very funny. Who put you up to this? Jung? Pavlov?”

  19. fred Says:

    Mother, James Kirk, and transferance is about to get NSFW.

  20. Tor Mented Says:

    You don’t have to be Sigmund Freud to see that all these comments deserve GSS.
    So, GSS.

  21. Tor Mented Says:

    (Hmm. I wonder what he meant by that.)

  22. GSS ex-noob Says:

    I suppose we ought to be grateful that the cover isn’t even more Freudian.

    What with UAI grads liking to throw every damn random symbol onto the covers in garish colors. Siggy and a tentacle monster are mild compared to what might have appeared on this.

    With that title and blurb, Mr. Shaw did a credible job. (Although for a guy obsessed with penises, you’d think Freud would be a little more concerned about that claw being where it is.)

  23. Bruce A Munro Says:

    @GSS ex-noob: “Hmm. Tentacles _and_ crab pincers? Yes, I think I see where that self-castration complex of yours comes from.”

  24. GSS ex-noob Says:

    @Bruce: Although squiddy’s expression seems to say “No shit, Sigmund” to that “brilliant” surmise.

    I really do commend the “alienist” pun, though.

    “The Remaking of Sigmund Freud” title makes me wonder if there were sequels, prequels, crossovers, spinoffs, and Freud Cinematic Universes.

    An Amazon review also mentions “a nonreclusive Emily Dickinson and her relationship with Samuel Clemens”, so… I guess it’s good they didn’t make the cover too?

    Goodreads is meh: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/132453.The_Remaking_of_Sigmund_Freud

    (be sure to translate the Italian review! It has one splendid turn of phrase.)

    Review here: https://english.netmassimo.com/2016/10/13/the-remaking-of-sigmund-freud-by-barry-n-malzberg/

Leave a Reply